↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Abuse: a risk factor for low birth weight? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Abuse: a risk factor for low birth weight? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2001
Pubmed ID
Authors

C C Murphy, B Schei, T L Myhr, J Du Mont

Abstract

Abuse during pregnancy is considered to be a potentially modifiable risk factor for low birth weight (LBW). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the strength of association between physical, sexual or emotional abuse during pregnancy and LBW. We selected papers for review from an electronic search of MEDLINE (1966-1999), CINAHL (1982-1997) and the Cochrane Library. We retrieved articles using the following MeSH headings and keywords: "infant low birth weight," "fetus," "perinatal care," "pregnancy," "prenatal care," "infant mortality," "violence," "battered women," "spouse abuse," "infant morbidity," "antenatal" and "neonatal." When necessary, we contacted authors to obtain data that were not included in the published material. We analyzed the methodological quality of each eligible study and selected those of the highest quality for meta-analysis. We reviewed 14 studies, of which 8 were selected for meta-analysis. Using a fixed-effects model, we found that women who reported physical, sexual or emotional abuse during pregnancy were more likely than nonabused women to give birth to a baby with LBW (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.8). Abuse may be part of a complex interaction of factors that contribute to LBW.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 188 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 31%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Psychology 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,403,818
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,816
of 8,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,033
of 40,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.