↓ Skip to main content

Between forwarding and mentoring: a qualitative study of recommending medical doctors for international postdoctoral research positions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Between forwarding and mentoring: a qualitative study of recommending medical doctors for international postdoctoral research positions
Published in
BMC Medical Education, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dario Sambunjak, Matko Marušić

Abstract

Young scientists rarely have extensive international connections that could facilitate their mobility. They often rely on their doctoral supervisors and other senior academics, who use their networks to generate opportunities for young scientists to gain international experience and provide the initial trigger for an outward move.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Librarian 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Social Sciences 8 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,656,184
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,578
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,020
of 112,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.