You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate vulnerability assessment for Pacific salmon and steelhead in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0217711 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa G. Crozier, Michelle M. McClure, Tim Beechie, Steven J. Bograd, David A. Boughton, Mark Carr, Thomas D. Cooney, Jason B. Dunham, Correigh M. Greene, Melissa A. Haltuch, Elliott L. Hazen, Damon M. Holzer, David D. Huff, Rachel C. Johnson, Chris E. Jordan, Isaac C. Kaplan, Steven T. Lindley, Nathan J. Mantua, Peter B. Moyle, James M. Myers, Mark W. Nelson, Brian C. Spence, Laurie A. Weitkamp, Thomas H. Williams, Ellen Willis-Norton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 32% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 61 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 51 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 72 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#304,777
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,350
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,901
of 360,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 2,591 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,591 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.