↓ Skip to main content

Arab American Immigrants in New York: Health Care and Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Arab American Immigrants in New York: Health Care and Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10903-007-9106-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan M. Shah, Claudia Ayash, Nora Alarifi Pharaon, Francesca M. Gany

Abstract

Arab immigrants living in the United States total between 1.5 million and 3.5 million, and have been growing in number each decade. New York's Arab population, at 405,000, ranks third in the U.S. after California and Michigan. Despite the large numbers, little health research has focused on this population. Data about the cancer incidence, mortality, and screening practices of Arab Americans is overwhelmingly lacking. To better understand the health care and cancer knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of Arab American immigrants, five single-gender focus groups were convened with Arab men and women in New York City. Attention was given to factors that act as barriers to utilization of general health care services, and of cancer prevention, treatment, and support services. The data revealed the importance of providing culturally and linguistically appropriate health interventions in partnership with trusted community leaders, and the need for follow-up research of this understudied immigrant population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Social Sciences 23 21%
Psychology 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2012.
All research outputs
#3,308,585
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#187
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,647
of 160,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them