| Title |
Inadvertent Intrathoracic Placement of a Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator Lead
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.03.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel A. Arias, Javier Jiménez-Diaz, Cristina Martín-Sierra, Marta Pachón, Felipe Higuera, Alberto Puchol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 35% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,819,171
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#422
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,890
of 367,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.