↓ Skip to main content

Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1068 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1092 Mendeley
Title
Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments
Published in
Plant and Soil, August 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020809400075
Authors

Felix D. Dakora, Donald A. Phillips

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,092 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 1%
Brazil 7 <1%
France 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 17 2%
Unknown 1030 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 274 25%
Student > Master 188 17%
Researcher 166 15%
Student > Bachelor 89 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 64 6%
Other 152 14%
Unknown 159 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 541 50%
Environmental Science 165 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 3%
Chemistry 28 3%
Other 55 5%
Unknown 211 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#962
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,693
of 48,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them