↓ Skip to main content

Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care
Published in
BMJ Open, July 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Leanne Jones, Mary Dixon-Woods, Graham P Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Librarian 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 28%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,730,271
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#3,240
of 25,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,125
of 358,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#132
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.