↓ Skip to main content

Mapping nano-scale mechanical heterogeneity of primary plant cell walls

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Botany, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping nano-scale mechanical heterogeneity of primary plant cell walls
Published in
Journal of Experimental Botany, March 2016
DOI 10.1093/jxb/erw117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gleb E. Yakubov, Mauricio R. Bonilla, Huaying Chen, Monika S. Doblin, Antony Bacic, Michael J. Gidley, Jason R. Stokes

Abstract

Nanoindentation experiments are performed using an atomic force microscope (AFM) to quantify the spatial distribution of mechanical properties of plant cell walls at nanometre length scales. At any specific location on the cell wall, a complex (non-linear) force-indentation response occurs that can be deconvoluted using a unique multiregime analysis (MRA). This allows an unambiguous evaluation of the local transverse elastic modulus of the wall. Nanomechanical measurements on suspension-cultured cells (SCCs), derived from Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) starchy endosperm, show three characteristic modes of deformation and a spatial distribution of elastic moduli across the surface. 'Soft' and 'hard' domains are found across length scales between 0.1 µm and 3 µm, which is well above a typical pore size of the polysaccharide mesh. The generality and wider applicability of this mechanical heterogeneity is verified through in planta characterization on leaf epidermal cells of Arabidopsis thaliana and L. multiflorum. The outcomes of this research provide a basis for uncovering and quantifying the relationships between local wall composition, architecture, cell growth, and/or morphogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Engineering 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Materials Science 7 8%
Physics and Astronomy 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,152,619
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Botany
#5,025
of 6,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,166
of 328,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Botany
#92
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.