↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic bacterial community profiles of chicken embryo gastrointestinal tract by using T-RFLP analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 273)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Metagenomic bacterial community profiles of chicken embryo gastrointestinal tract by using T-RFLP analysis
Published in
Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics, March 2016
DOI 10.1134/s1607672916010130
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. A. Ilina, E. A. Yildirim, I. N. Nikonov, V. A. Filippova, G. Y. Laptev, N. I. Novikova, A. A. Grozina, T. N. Lenkova, V. A. Manukyan, I. A. Egorov, V. I. Fisinin

Abstract

Thirty microbial phylotypes of microorganisms were found in the gastrointestinal tract of chicken belonging to the Hajseks White breed, and 38 phylotypes were found in the gastrointestinal tract of chicken belonging to the Hajseks Brown breed. The microbiome of the gastrointestinal tract of the chicken embryos of the Hajseks White breed was dominated by the typical representatives of avian intestinal microflora-bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae (47.3%), orders Actinomycetales (13.6%) and Bifidobacteriales (20.6%), and the family Lachnospiraceae (1.1%). The microbiome of the gastrointestinal tract of the chicken embryos of the Hajseks Brown breed was dominated by the pathogenic bacteria of the order Rickettsiales (94.8%). The metagenome of gastrointestinal tract of both breeds also contained a small number of genes of unidentified bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 44%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,488,907
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics
#9
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,460
of 306,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them