↓ Skip to main content

Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
Title
Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4321-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret S. Herridge, Marc Moss, Catherine L. Hough, Ramona O. Hopkins, Todd W. Rice, O. Joseph Bienvenu, Elie Azoulay

Abstract

Outcomes after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are similar to those of other survivors of critical illness and largely affect the nerve, muscle, and central nervous system but also include a constellation of varied physical devastations ranging from contractures and frozen joints to tooth loss and cosmesis. Compromised quality of life is related to a spectrum of impairment of physical, social, emotional, and neurocognitive function and to a much lesser extent discrete pulmonary disability. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW) is ubiquitous and includes contributions from both critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy, and recovery from these lesions may be incomplete at 5 years after ICU discharge. Cognitive impairment in ARDS survivors ranges from 70 to 100 % at hospital discharge, 46 to 80 % at 1 year, and 20 % at 5 years, and mood disorders including depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are also sustained and prevalent. Robust multidisciplinary and longitudinal interventions that improve these outcomes are still uncertain and data in our literature are conflicting. Studies are needed in family members of ARDS survivors to better understand long-term outcomes of the post-ICU family syndrome and to evaluate how it affects patient recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 506 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 13%
Researcher 58 11%
Student > Bachelor 48 9%
Student > Postgraduate 44 9%
Other 40 8%
Other 117 23%
Unknown 136 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 220 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 15%
Psychology 17 3%
Neuroscience 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 31 6%
Unknown 145 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#151,951
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#109
of 5,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,688
of 307,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.