| Title |
Influence of Paleolithic diet on anthropometric markers in chronic diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0457-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ehrika Vanessa Almeida de Menezes, Helena Alves de Carvalho Sampaio, Antônio Augusto Ferreira Carioca, Nara Andrade Parente, Filipe Oliveira Brito, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Ana Célia Caetano de Souza, Soraia Pinheiro Machado Arruda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 17% |
| Argentina | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Chile | 3 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 94 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 102 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#313,632
of 25,255,356 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#106
of 1,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,235
of 352,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,255,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.