You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tranexamic acid to improve functional status in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: the TICH-2 RCT
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., July 2019
|
DOI | 10.3310/hta23350 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nikola Sprigg, Katie Flaherty, Jason P Appleton, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Daniel Bereczki, Maia Beridze, Alfonso Ciccone, Ronan Collins, Robert A Dineen, Lelia Duley, Juan José Egea-Guerrero, Timothy J England, Michal Karlinski, Kailash Krishnan, Ann Charlotte Laska, Zhe Kang Law, Christian Ovesen, Serefnur Ozturk, Stuart J Pocock, Ian Roberts, Thompson G Robinson, Christine Roffe, Nils Peters, Polly Scutt, Jegan Thanabalan, David Werring, David Whynes, Lisa Woodhouse, Philip M Bath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Comoros | 1 | 17% |
India | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
Researcher | 14 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 41 | 19% |
Unknown | 89 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 9% |
Psychology | 13 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 8% |
Unknown | 94 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#820
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,118
of 366,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.