| Title |
Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric R. Manahan, Henry M. Kuerer, Molly Sebastian, Kevin S. Hughes, Judy C. Boughey, David M. Euhus, Susan K. Boolbol, Walton A. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 33% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 28% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 63 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 554. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#44,298
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 7,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#847
of 360,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.