| Title |
Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.070281 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Gilbody, Trevor Sheldon, Allan House |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 27% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 38% |
| Psychology | 37 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,129,289
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,559
of 9,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,377
of 89,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#6
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.