↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of a School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Intervention: Evidence from a Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies Curriculum

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of a School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Intervention: Evidence from a Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies Curriculum
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40258-019-00498-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex J. Turner, Matt Sutton, Mark Harrison, Alexandra Hennessey, Neil Humphrey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 39 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 47 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,352,129
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#86
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,996
of 352,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.