| Title |
Fish as proxies of ecological and environmental change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-016-9424-3 |
| Authors |
Christopher Izzo, Zoë A. Doubleday, Gretchen L. Grammer, Kayla L. Gilmore, Heidi K. Alleway, Thomas C. Barnes, Morgan C. F. Disspain, Ana Judith Giraldo, Nastaran Mazloumi, Bronwyn M. Gillanders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 29% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#983,416
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#31
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,241
of 306,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them