↓ Skip to main content

Substance Use by Immigrant Generation in a U.S.-Mexico Border City

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,261)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Substance Use by Immigrant Generation in a U.S.-Mexico Border City
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-016-0407-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oralia Loza, Ernesto Castañeda, Brian Diedrich

Abstract

Immigrant generation status has an impact on substance use, with lower use rates for recent immigrants. Substance use surveillance data are reported at the national and state levels; however, no systematic collection of data exists at the city level for the general population. In particular, rates of substance use have not been published for El Paso, Texas. The aims of this study are to estimate the prevalence of substance use among Hispanics in El Paso and to determine the association between substance use and immigrant generation. Hispanic residents of El Paso (N = 837) were interviewed. Demographic, immigration, and substance use data were collected. Bivariate analysis indicated that substance use increased as immigrant generation increased, while perceived problems with substance use decreased. In comparison to Texas and national data, our data showed that the rates of tobacco, marijuana, and illicit drug use were lower among young adults in El Paso.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Other 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 21%
Psychology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2024.
All research outputs
#389,615
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#17
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,581
of 303,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.