You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The predictors of and reasons for non-adherence in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis commencing methotrexate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rheumatology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/rheumatology/kez274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holly F Hope, Kimme L Hyrich, James Anderson, James Bluett, Jamie C Sergeant, Anne Barton, Lis Cordingley, Suzanne M M Verstappen, Ade Adebajo, Khalid Ahmed, Atheer Al-Ansari, Roshan Amarasena, Marwan Bukhari, Margaret Callan, Easwaradhas G Chelliah, Hector Chinoy, Annie Cooper, Bhaskar Dasgupta, Martin Davis, James Galloway, Andrew Gough, Michael Green, Nicola Gullick, Jennifer Hamilton, Waji Hassan, Samantha Hider, Kimme Hyrich, Sanjeet Kamath, Susan Knight, Suzanne Lane, Martin Lee, Sarah Levy, Lizzy Macphie, Christopher Marguerie, Tarnya Marshall, Catherine Mathews, Frank McKenna, Sophia Naz, Mark Perry, Louise Pollard, Brian Quilty, Lindsay Robertson, Dipak Roy, Paul Sanders, Vadivelu Saravanan, David Scott, Gillian Smith, Richard Smith, Deborah Symmons, Lee-Suan Teh, Nick Viner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 69% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,600,956
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#984
of 6,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,761
of 345,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#21
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.