| Title |
Implementation of Early Intervention Protocol in Australia for ‘High Risk’ Injured Workers is Associated with Fewer Lost Work Days Over 2 Years Than Usual (Stepped) Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-019-09849-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. K. Nicholas, D. S. J. Costa, S. J. Linton, C. J. Main, W. S. Shaw, G. Pearce, M. Gleeson, R. Z. Pinto, F. M. Blyth, J. H. McAuley, R. J. E. M. Smeets, A. McGarity |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 18% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 73% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
| Psychology | 11 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,028,570
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#24
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,652
of 360,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.