↓ Skip to main content

北海道移住と藍業の展開 : 興産社を中心に(2006年度シンポジウム 歴史の転換期における藍)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Agricultural History, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
北海道移住と藍業の展開 : 興産社を中心に(2006年度シンポジウム 歴史の転換期における藍)
Published in
The Journal of Agricultural History, March 2017
DOI 10.18966/joah.41.0_17
Authors

佐藤 正志

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Agricultural History
#13
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,397
of 324,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Agricultural History
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.