You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian Banks, David Weller, Mehmet Ungan, Peter Selby, Matti Aapro, Marc Beishon, Marije Bolt, Fiona Bonanno, Claire Champeix, Csaba Dégi, Lisa Jelf Eneqvist, Joanna Kazmierska, Agnieszka Kolacinska, Simon Malas, Sébastien Moine, Danica Rotar Pavlic, Richard Price, Fiona Walter, Lynda Wyld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 50 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,449,896
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
#45
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,470
of 346,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.