↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of MRA and MRI for the detection of glenoid labral injury

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of MRA and MRI for the detection of glenoid labral injury
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00402-012-1493-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby O. Smith, Benjamin T. Drew, Andoni P. Toms

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Other 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#330
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,487
of 172,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.