↓ Skip to main content

The diagnosis of pseudoneurotic schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric Quarterly, March 1959
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The diagnosis of pseudoneurotic schizophrenia
Published in
Psychiatric Quarterly, March 1959
DOI 10.1007/bf01659427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul H. Hoch, James P. Cattell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Professor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,413,245
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#212
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them