↓ Skip to main content

TrainMiC®: a programme for life-long learning in metrology in chemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Accreditation and Quality Assurance, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
TrainMiC®: a programme for life-long learning in metrology in chemistry
Published in
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00769-009-0486-y
Authors

Philip Taylor, Ewa Bulska, Steluta Duta, Nineta Majcen, Emilia Vassileva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 43%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,365,885
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#87
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,717
of 172,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them