You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use Reduces Risk of Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction in a Pooled Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastroenterology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda M. Liao, Thomas L. Vaughan, Douglas A. Corley, Michael B. Cook, Alan G. Casson, Farin Kamangar, Christian C. Abnet, Harvey A. Risch, Carol Giffen, Neal D. Freedman, Wong–Ho Chow, Shahram Sadeghi, Nirmala Pandeya, David C. Whiteman, Liam J. Murray, Leslie Bernstein, Marilie D. Gammon, Anna H. Wu |
| Abstract |
Regular use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been reported to reduce risks of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA). However, individual studies have been too small to accurately assess the effects of medication type, frequency, or duration of use. We performed a pooled analysis to investigate these associations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#10,029
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,716
of 244,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#56
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.