↓ Skip to main content

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Port Valdez Shrimp and Sediment

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Port Valdez Shrimp and Sediment
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00244-016-0279-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark G. Carls, Larry Holland, Erik Pihl, Marilyn A. Zaleski, John Moran, Stanley D. Rice

Abstract

Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from oil were present in some shrimp from Port Valdez, site of a ballast water treatment facility at the Alyeska Alaska Marine Terminal (AMT). Low-level petrogenic PAH concentrations were generally restricted to shrimp eggs in the vicinity of the AMT and extended along the southern shore of Port Valdez to Anderson Bay. Eggs had greater lipid content than other tissues and thus were the most vulnerable biological compartment to hydrocarbon accumulation. Petrogenic hydrocarbons were not observed in shrimp muscle and cephalothoraxes; thus, these tissues do not pose a human health risk. Risk for children older than age 2 years and adults consuming eggs also was low except for two unusual samples (of 32), collected about 17 km west of the treatment facility. In general, PAH loads were consistent with local time series data in other species. We infer that the accumulation mechanism was dissolved uptake from water, consistent with passive sampler observations completed more than a decade earlier. Hydrocarbon levels in the majority of samples were below toxic thresholds. Total PAH accumulation was substantially greater in some pink shrimp than in other species, thus differences in habitat utilization (muddy vs. rocky substrate) are potentially important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 19%
Chemistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,541,858
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,565
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,309
of 302,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.