↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to promote patients and families’ involvement in adult intensive care settings: a protocol for a mixed-method systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to promote patients and families’ involvement in adult intensive care settings: a protocol for a mixed-method systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1102-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Xyrichis, Simon Fletcher, Sally Brearley, Julia Philippou, Ed Purssell, Marius Terblanche, Anne Marie Rafferty, Scott Reeves

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Psychology 5 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,049,928
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#326
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,127
of 359,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.