↓ Skip to main content

Ephemerality of discrete methane vents in lake sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ephemerality of discrete methane vents in lake sediments
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016gl068668
Authors

Benjamin P. Scandella, Liam Pillsbury, Thomas Weber, Carolyn Ruppel, Harold F. Hemond, Ruben Juanes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 8 15%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 25%
Environmental Science 10 19%
Engineering 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,345,186
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#15,825
of 22,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,352
of 316,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#211
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.