You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shape-persistent porous organic cage supported palladium nanoparticles as heterogeneous catalytic materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nanoscale, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c9nr04553h |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shan Jiang, Harrison J Cox, Evangelos I Papaioannou, Chenyang Tang, Huiyu Liu, Billy J Murdoch, Emma K Gibson, Ian S Metcalfe, John S O Evans, Simon K Beaumont |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 71% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 16 | 47% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,972,467
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Nanoscale
#2,036
of 9,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,428
of 439,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanoscale
#170
of 1,514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.