↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of Rhesus blood group antigens and weak D alleles in the population of Albania.

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Transfusion, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution of Rhesus blood group antigens and weak D alleles in the population of Albania.
Published in
Blood Transfusion, June 2014
DOI 10.2450/2014.0240-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Merita Xhetani, Irena Seferi, Claude Férec, Grigor Zoraqi, Yann Fichou

Abstract

Determination of Rhesus (Rh) status is of critical importance in the field of both transfusion and obstetric medicine. As the distribution of Rh phenotypes was unknown in the Albanian population, we investigated the donor population in Albania to estimate the prevalence of each phenotype, as well as to identify and characterise the variants at the molecular level. A total of 38,836 blood donors were phenotyped for Rh D, C, c, E and e antigens by routine serological methods, and samples with reduced D antigen expression underwent molecular characterisation by a Tm-shift genotyping method and direct sequencing. Among all donors 89.00% and 10.86% were D-positive and D-negative, respectively, while 0.14% (n=55) of the donors were found to be weak D-positive. Overall 45/55 samples (81.8%) were resolved by Tm-shift screening, showing that approximately 67% of the variant D alleles were weak D type 1, while weak D type 3 (9.1%) and weak D type 2 (3.6%) were less common. A novel c.932A>G (p.Y311C) variant was also found in the heterozygous state by direct sequencing. This extensive study reveals the distribution of Rh phenotypes in the Albanian population, the low prevalence of individuals with a weak D phenotype, and the specific pattern of distribution of the three most common variant alleles in this Caucasian population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,444,944
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Blood Transfusion
#88
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,100
of 243,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Transfusion
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.