↓ Skip to main content

Single Item Measures of Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization Are Useful for Assessing Burnout in Medical Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
510 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
Title
Single Item Measures of Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization Are Useful for Assessing Burnout in Medical Professionals
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11606-009-1129-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin P. West, Liselotte N. Dyrbye, Jeff A. Sloan, Tait D. Shanafelt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 425 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 13%
Student > Master 52 12%
Other 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 113 26%
Unknown 100 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 159 37%
Psychology 55 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 6%
Social Sciences 22 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 2%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 120 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,836,559
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,392
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,574
of 111,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.