↓ Skip to main content

Associations between psychologists’ thinking styles and accuracy on a diagnostic classification task

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Associations between psychologists’ thinking styles and accuracy on a diagnostic classification task
Published in
Synthese, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0081-3
Authors

Alexander A. Aarts, Cilia L. M. Witteman, Pierre M. Souren, Jos I. M. Egger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 56%
Computer Science 2 11%
Mathematics 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#16,048,662
of 25,381,783 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,469
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,543
of 162,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.