↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators to office-based opioid agonist therapy prescribing and effective interventions to increase provider prescribing: protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to office-based opioid agonist therapy prescribing and effective interventions to increase provider prescribing: protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1076-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara L. Nixon, Jazmin C. Marlinga, K. Alix Hayden, Kelly J. Mrklas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 35 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 36 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,686,631
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,798
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,338
of 346,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#58
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.