| Title |
Digoxin Discontinuation and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Awais Malik, Ravi Masson, Steven Singh, Wen-Chih Wu, Milton Packer, Bertram Pitt, Finn Waagstein, Charity J. Morgan, Richard M. Allman, Gregg C. Fonarow, Ali Ahmed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 13% |
| Spain | 18 | 10% |
| Mexico | 13 | 7% |
| Colombia | 7 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 3% |
| Argentina | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 12% |
| Scientists | 20 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#356,027
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#829
of 16,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,151
of 359,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#21
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.