You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Options for the conservation of large and medium-sized mammals in the Cape Floristic Region hotspot, South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00426-3 |
| Authors |
Graham I.H Kerley, Robert L Pressey, Richard M Cowling, André F Boshoff, Rebecca Sims-Castley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 14 | 4% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| France | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 327 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 9% |
| Other | 73 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 194 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 116 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,133
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,465
of 52,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.