↓ Skip to main content

The Jesus delusion: A theoretical and phenomenological look

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The Jesus delusion: A theoretical and phenomenological look
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, June 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01533683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Gettis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Philosophy 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,926,585
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#416
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,540
of 12,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.