| Title |
Opinions of citizen scientists on open access to UK butterfly and moth occurrence data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01824-6 |
| Authors |
Richard Fox, Nigel A. D. Bourn, Emily B. Dennis, Richard T. Heafield, Ilya M. D. Maclean, Robert J. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 53% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 78% |
| Scientists | 13 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#898,431
of 25,253,876 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#101
of 2,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,117
of 352,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,253,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.