↓ Skip to main content

Flexible Visual Processing in Young Adults with Autism: The Effects of Implicit Learning on a Global–Local Task

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Flexible Visual Processing in Young Adults with Autism: The Effects of Implicit Learning on a Global–Local Task
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1485-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana A. Hayward, David I. Shore, Jelena Ristic, Hanna Kovshoff, Grace Iarocci, Laurent Mottron, Jacob A. Burack

Abstract

We utilized a hierarchical figures task to determine the default level of perceptual processing and the flexibility of visual processing in a group of high-functioning young adults with autism (n = 12) and a typically developing young adults, matched by chronological age and IQ (n = 12). In one task, participants attended to one level of the figure and ignored the other in order to determine the default level of processing. In the other task, participants attended to both levels and the proportion of trials in which a target would occur at either level was manipulated. Both groups exhibited a global processing bias and showed similar flexibility in performance, suggesting that persons with autism may not be impaired in flexible shifting between task levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,670,027
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,767
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,906
of 158,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#27
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.