↓ Skip to main content

Metabolite profiling of CHO cells with different growth characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology & Bioengineering, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolite profiling of CHO cells with different growth characteristics
Published in
Biotechnology & Bioengineering, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/bit.24496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie Dietmair, Mark P. Hodson, Lake‐Ee Quek, Nicholas E. Timmins, Panagiotis Chrysanthopoulos, Shana S. Jacob, Peter Gray, Lars K. Nielsen

Abstract

Mammalian cell cultures are the predominant system for the production of recombinant proteins requiring post-translational modifications. As protein yields are a function of growth performance (among others), and performance varies greatly between culture medium (e.g., different growth rates and peak cell densities), an understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning this variability would facilitate rational medium and process optimization, increasing product yields, and reducing costs. We employed a metabolomics approach to analyze differences in metabolite concentrations of CHO cells cultivated in three different media exhibiting different growth rates and maximum viable cell densities. Analysis of intra- and extracellular metabolite concentrations over the course of the cultures using a combination of HPLC and GC-MS, readily detected medium specific and time dependent changes. Using multivariate data analysis, we identified a range of metabolites correlating with growth rate, illustrating how metabolomics can be used to relate gross phenotypic changes to the fine details of cellular metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 234 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 25%
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 12 5%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 18%
Chemistry 21 9%
Engineering 19 8%
Chemical Engineering 13 5%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology & Bioengineering
#2,239
of 6,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,763
of 172,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology & Bioengineering
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.