| Title |
Early Health System Experiences with Collaborative Care (CoCM) Billing Codes: a Qualitative Study of Leadership and Support Staff
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05195-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew D. Carlo, Andrea Corage Baden, Rachelle L. McCarty, Anna D. H. Ratzliff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 71% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,601,377
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,244
of 8,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,168
of 362,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#44
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.