| Title |
Use of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with viral bronchiolitis outside pediatric intensive care units
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00431-019-03434-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mélanie Panciatici, Candice Fabre, Sophie Tardieu, Emilie Sauvaget, Marion Dequin, Nathalie Stremler-Le Bel, Emmanuelle Bosdure, Jean-Christophe Dubus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 23% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,635,295
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#168
of 3,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,184
of 348,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.