You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of early assessment and intervention by teams involving health and social care professionals in the emergency department: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0220709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marica Cassarino, Katie Robinson, Rosie Quinn, Breda Naddy, Andrew O’Regan, Damien Ryan, Fiona Boland, Marie E. Ward, Rosa McNamara, Margaret O’Connor, Gerard McCarthy, Rose Galvin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 11 | 65% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,332,778
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,534
of 222,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,609
of 359,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#438
of 2,575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.