| Title |
The Role of Forest Elephants in Shaping Tropical Forest–Savanna Coexistence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-019-00424-3 |
| Authors |
Anabelle W. Cardoso, Yadvinder Malhi, Imma Oliveras, David Lehmann, Josué Edzang Ndong, Edmond Dimoto, Emma Bush, Kathryn Jeffery, Nicolas Labriere, Simon L. Lewis, Lee T. J. White, William Bond, Katharine Abernethy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 24% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| South Africa | 4 | 7% |
| Gabon | 4 | 7% |
| Madagascar | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Benin | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 67% |
| Scientists | 17 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#463,678
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#13
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,571
of 352,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.