| Title |
A cross-sectional study of the associations between the traditional Japanese diet and nutrient intakes: the NILS-LSA project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0468-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu Zhang, Rei Otsuka, Yasutake Tomata, Hiroshi Shimokata, Chikako Tange, Makiko Tomida, Yukiko Nishita, Sanae Matsuyama, Ichiro Tsuji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#510,375
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#167
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,459
of 360,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.