You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pleiotropic Meta-Analysis of Cognition, Education, and Schizophrenia Differentiates Roles of Early Neurodevelopmental and Adult Synaptic Pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.06.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max Lam, W. David Hill, Joey W. Trampush, Jin Yu, Emma Knowles, Gail Davies, Eli Stahl, Laura Huckins, David C. Liewald, Srdjan Djurovic, Ingrid Melle, Kjetil Sundet, Andrea Christoforou, Ivar Reinvang, Pamela DeRosse, Astri J. Lundervold, Vidar M. Steen, Thomas Espeseth, Katri Räikkönen, Elisabeth Widen, Aarno Palotie, Johan G. Eriksson, Ina Giegling, Bettina Konte, Annette M. Hartmann, Panos Roussos, Stella Giakoumaki, Katherine E. Burdick, Antony Payton, William Ollier, Ornit Chiba-Falek, Deborah K. Attix, Anna C. Need, Elizabeth T. Cirulli, Aristotle N. Voineskos, Nikos C. Stefanis, Dimitrios Avramopoulos, Alex Hatzimanolis, Dan E. Arking, Nikolaos Smyrnis, Robert M. Bilder, Nelson A. Freimer, Tyrone D. Cannon, Edythe London, Russell A. Poldrack, Fred W. Sabb, Eliza Congdon, Emily Drabant Conley, Matthew A. Scult, Dwight Dickinson, Richard E. Straub, Gary Donohoe, Derek Morris, Aiden Corvin, Michael Gill, Ahmad R. Hariri, Daniel R. Weinberger, Neil Pendleton, Panos Bitsios, Dan Rujescu, Jari Lahti, Stephanie Le Hellard, Matthew C. Keller, Ole A. Andreassen, Ian J. Deary, David C. Glahn, Anil K. Malhotra, Todd Lencz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,325,413
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,695
of 5,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,721
of 360,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#32
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.