↓ Skip to main content

Action observation in infancy: implications for neuro‐rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Action observation in infancy: implications for neuro‐rehabilitation
Published in
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, March 2016
DOI 10.1111/dmcn.13048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentina Burzi, Gessica Tealdi, Roslyn N Boyd, Andrea Guzzetta

Abstract

Action observation therapy has been found to be effective in improving hand motor function in both adults with stroke and children with unilateral cerebral palsy. We here propose a provocative hypothesis arguing that the same therapy might be effective in very early intervention in infants with unilateral or asymmetric brain damage, but through a different underlying mechanism. If the activation of motor networks induced in infancy by action observation enhances the excitability of the damaged sensorimotor cortex, it could also accelerate the maturation of the corticospinal tract and the adaptive shaping of the spinal motor circuits. This hypothesis should be explored carefully in prospective studies and, if confirmed, might support the use of action observation therapy at a much earlier time than experimented so far.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 25%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Psychology 6 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,449,393
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#3,331
of 4,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,293
of 300,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#48
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.