You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subcutaneous Fondaparinux versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa035451 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H R Büller, B L Davidson, H Decousus, A Gallus, M Gent, F Piovella, M H Prins, G Raskob, A E M van den Berg-Segers, R Cariou, O Leeuwenkamp, A W A Lensing |
| Abstract |
The standard initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism is intravenous unfractionated heparin, requiring laboratory monitoring and hospitalization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 48% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,367,265
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#14,550
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,034
of 58,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#41
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.