| Title |
Emotion Regulation and Anxiety Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11920-012-0262-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josh M. Cisler, Bunmi O. Olatunji |
| Abstract |
A growing body of research suggests that the construct of emotion regulation is important for understanding the onset, maintenance, and treatment of anxiety disorders. In this review, we provide a selective overview of this emerging field and highlight the major sources of evidence. First, evidence suggests that the construct of emotion regulation can be differentiated from the construct of emotion. Second, there is a large and consistent body of research demonstrating that emotion regulation strategies can modulate emotional responding, and this finding is observed in both behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Third, measures of emotion regulation explain incremental variance in measures of anxiety disorder symptoms not accounted for by measures of negative affect. Although the research implicating emotion regulation in the anxiety disorders is promising, future research will be necessary to further clarify causal mechanisms explaining how emotion regulation confers vulnerability for anxiety disorders and to improve the clarity and consistency of definitions of emotion regulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 252 | 57% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 7% |
| Unknown | 101 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,175,497
of 25,220,525 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#142
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,799
of 161,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,220,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.