You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
天津北彊博物館に代表されし新石器時代の遺物(二)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Anthropological Science, January 1931
|
DOI | 10.1537/ase1911.46.90 |
Authors |
リサン エ, 松本 信廣譯 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 20% |
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,276,498
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Anthropological Science
#2
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20
of 3,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anthropological Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them