↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery—where do we stand and where are we going?

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery—where do we stand and where are we going?
Published in
Child's Nervous System, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00381-019-04314-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Waleed A. Azab

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,888
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,234
of 2,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,183
of 346,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#35
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.